CLASS="SECT1" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000FF" VLINK="#840084" ALINK="#0000FF" >

1. Introduction

This HOWTO guides you through the installation of SQL Anywhere Studio 7.0.2 for Linux and the basic operation and administration of Adaptive Server Anywhere databases.

1.1. New versions of this document

The latest version of this document should always be available at the Linux Documentation project website (http://www.linuxdoc.org/).

1.2. Content and Audience

Within this document, you will find a list of the supported Linux distributions ("Section 2"). It is intended for moderately experienced users of Linux or UNIX. Familiarity with relational database concepts is certainly useful, but not a requirement. "Section 1.5" contains a summary of relational database concepts.

1.3. Adaptive Server Anywhere features

Adaptive Server Anywhere (Adaptive Server Anywhere) is the full SQL relational database management system at the heart of SQL Anywhere Studio. Ideally suited for use as an embedded database, in mobile computing, or as a workgroup server, it includes the following among its features:

Some of the more specific features include:

For further details about Adaptive Server Anywhere, please visit the following links:

1.4. Quirks

1.4.1. Alt and Function keys

Sometimes the Alt keys or the F1-F10 keys may not function in the terminal where you are running Interactive SQL.

To emulate the Alt key, press Ctrl-A. Then press whatever key was to be pressed with the Alt key. For example, instead of pressing Alt-F, you would press Ctrl-A, then F.

To emulate the function keys, press Ctrl-F, followed by the number of the function key you wanted to press. For example, instead of pressing F9, you would press Ctrl-F, then 9. For F10, use the zero key.

1.5. What's a Relational Database?

If you are already familiar with relational databases, you can skip this section.

1.5.1. Definition

A relational database-management system (RDBMS) is a system for storing and retrieving data, in which the data is organized in tables. A relational database consists of a collection of tables that store interrelated data.

If that doesn't quite make sense yet, read on.

1.5.2. Example

Suppose you have some software to keep track of sales orders, and each order is stored in the form of a table, called sales_order. It has information about the customer (for example, her name, address and phone number), the date of the order, and information about the sales representative (for example his name, department, and office phone number). Let's put all this into a table, with the data for a few orders:

Table 1. The sales_order table

cust_namecust_addresscust_city_state_zipcust_phoneorder_dateemp_nameemp_deptemp_phone
M. Devlin3114 Pioneer Ave.Rutherford, NJ 07070201555896619930316R. OverbeySales5105557255
M. Devlin3114 Pioneer Ave.Rutherford, NJ 07070201555896619940405M. KellySales5085553769
J. Gagliardo2800 Park Ave.Hull, PQ K1A 0H3819555953919940326M.GarciaSales7135553431
E. Peros50 Market St.Rochester, NY 14624716555427519930603P. ChinSales4045552341
E. Peros50 Market St.Rochester, NY 14624716555427519940127M.GarciaSales7135553431
E. Peros50 Market St.Rochester, NY 14624716555427519940520J. KlobucherSales7135558627

Everything appears nice and ordered, but there's a fair bit of redundancy. M. Devlin's name appears twice, along with his address and phone number. E. Peros' details appear three times. If you look carefully at the employee side of things, you'll notice that M. Garcia is repeated, as well.

Wouldn't it be nice if you could separate that information and only store it once, rather than several times? In the long term, it would certainly save disk space and allow for greater flexibility. Since redundant data entry is minimized, it would also reduce the chances of erroneous data entering the database, increasing consistency. Well, we can see three different entities involved here: the customer, the order, and the employee. So let's take each of the individuals, put them into categories, and give them identification numbers so they can be referenced.

Table 2. The customer table

idnameaddresscity_state_zipphone
101M. Devlin3114 Pioneer Ave.Rutherford, NJ 070702015558966
109J. Gagliardo2800 Park Ave.Hull, PQ K1A 0H38195559539
180E. Peros50 Market St.Rochester, NY 146247165554275

Table 3. The employee table

idnamedeptphone
299R. OverbeySales5105557255
902M. KellySales5085553769
667M.GarciaSales7135553431
129P. ChinSales4045552341
467J. KlobucherSales7135558627

Table 4. The new sales_order table

idcust_idorder_datesales_rep_id
200110119930316299
258310119940405902
257610919940326667
208118019930603129
250318019940127667
264018019940520467

As you can see, each customer's information is stored only once, and the same goes for each employee. The sales_order table is a lot smaller, too. Each row, representing a sales order, refers to a cust_id and an emp_id.

By looking up the customer corresponding to a cust_id (which is unique), one can find all the needed data on that customer, without having to repeat it in sales_order. In addition, an id column has been added. Its purpose will be explained in the next section.

Why do this, you ask? By eliminating redundancy, this kind of structure reduces the opportunities for inconsistencies to seep in, in addition to lowering storage requirements. If you had to change E. Peros' address in the old sales_order table, you'd have to do it three times, which would take three times as long and give you three times as many chances to make an error. In the newer table, all you'd have to do is change her address once, in the customer table. Also, by carefully separating data, you make access control simpler.

Finally, can you spot another redundancy? The employee table has "Sales" all the way down the dept column. For an organization with multiple departments, you'd want to add a department table and reference it from a dept_id column instead.

1.5.3. Primary and Foreign Keys

As described in the previous section, you can separate a table into interrelated tables. But how do you go about relating tables to each other? In relational databases, primary keys and foreign keys help you link tables together. Primary keys are columns that uniquely identify each row of a table, and foreign keys define the relationship between the rows of two separate tables. Proper use of primary and foreign keys will help you efficiently hold information without excessive redundancy.

Every table should have a primary key to ensure that each row is uniquely identified. This often takes the form of an ID number being assigned to each row, as in the previous section's example. The id column forms the primary key.

As long as you can guarantee the uniqueness of the data in a particular column, though, that column can be a primary key. For example, if you only want one entry per day to be put into a particular table, you could use the date as that table's primary key.

Tables are related to one another by foreign keys. In the sales_order example, the cust_id and sales_rep columns would be called foreign keys to the customer and employee tables, respectively. For terminology's sake, you might want to know that in this case, the sales_order table is called the foreign or referencing table, while the customer and employee tables are called the primary or referenced tables.